Skip to content

Day 4 of 10

The Levitical Laws and Their Meaning

Reading Leviticus honestly — the love commands are in the same book

Today's Scripture

Leviticus 18:22 — "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."

Leviticus 19:18 — "You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord."

Leviticus 19:33-34 — "When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God."

The Big Idea

One chapter of Leviticus contains the verse most often quoted in the sexuality debate. The next chapter contains the love commands Jesus called the heart of the whole law. Honest Bible reading means refusing to quote chapter 18 without obeying chapter 19 — and refusing to dismiss chapter 18 without explaining why the New Testament keeps its sexual ethic while letting the food laws go.

Reflection

The shellfish argument

You have probably seen the meme. Someone quotes Leviticus 18:22 — "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination" — and someone replies: "You also eat shrimp and wear mixed fabrics. Leviticus bans those too. Why pick and choose?"

It is a fair challenge, and it deserves a real answer, not an eye-roll. The answer lives in a churchy word worth learning: hermeneutics — simply, the method you use when you read the Bible. Everyone has one, including the people who say they just read the plain text. The question is whether your method is consistent. Tim Keller, who answered this exact challenge in print, admitted it touched a nerve:

"I find it frustrating when I read or hear columnists, pundits, or journalists dismiss Christians as inconsistent because 'they pick and choose which of the rules in the Bible to obey.'" — Tim Keller, 'Old Testament Law and the Charge of Inconsistency'

Here is the method the church has used for centuries. Israel's law contained different kinds of commands. Some marked Israel off as a distinct nation — food laws, fabric rules, ritual washings. Think of them as Israel's uniform: they signaled who belonged to God's people while the world waited for the Messiah. Other commands expressed God's permanent moral character — do not murder, do not steal, love your neighbor, honor the marriage bed.

The New Testament itself draws this line; Christians did not invent it. Jesus said, Matthew 5:17 — "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." Fulfill, not shred. So what happens to the uniform once the Messiah arrives? Mark tells us that in teaching about purity, Mark 7:19 — "Thus he declared all foods clean." And when Peter hesitated, God repeated the lesson in a vision: Acts 10:15 — "What God has made clean, do not call common." The food laws were fulfilled and retired — by God, on the record.

But notice what the New Testament never retires. Its writers restate the Old Testament's sexual ethic again and again — Jesus grounding marriage in Genesis (as we saw yesterday), Paul in Romans 1 and 1 Corinthians 6 (as we will see tomorrow). Shellfish gets released; the sexual ethic gets repeated. That is not random picking and choosing. It is following the line the New Testament itself draws. A word about "abomination," too — a strong old word meaning something detestable to God. Before anyone wields it like a club, note that Proverbs applies the same word to dishonest scales and lying lips. It marks how seriously God takes a thing; it was never a license to despise people.

One more honesty check before we move on. If this ceremonial-versus-moral distinction were just a trick for winning modern arguments, you would expect Christians to have invented it recently. They did not. Believers have read the law this way since the church's earliest centuries, long before our current debates existed. That does not make the method automatically right — but it does mean it is not a dodge cooked up to excuse the brunch menu.

Holy — and what that strange word means

Why did God hand Israel all these laws in the first place? The reason sits at the front of chapter 19. Leviticus 19:2 — "You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy." Holy means set apart — whole, undivided, unmixed. And notice the logic: God does not say "be holy because the rules are the rules." He says be holy because I am. The law is a portrait of the Lawgiver. A.W. Tozer pressed this home:

"Holy is the way God is. To be holy he does not conform to a standard. He is that standard." — A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy

That is why the people in the Bible who knew the law best did not experience it as a cage. Psalm 19:7 — "The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple." Reviving the soul — the psalmist talks about the law the way you talk about cold water on a hot day. C.S. Lewis, puzzling over that strange joy, found an image for it:

"Their delight in the Law is a delight in having touched firmness; like the pedestrian's delight in feeling the hard road beneath his feet after a false short cut has long entangled him in muddy fields." — C.S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms

Our culture assumes that rules about sex are mud and freedom is the road. The psalmists assumed the opposite: God's commands are the firm path out of the swamp. Day 2 explained why — when every heart manufactures idols and every desire is bent, a word from outside ourselves is not oppression. It is rescue equipment.

The chapter nobody quotes

Now for the part of Leviticus that almost never makes it into the comment wars. One page after the famous prohibition, the same book — the same God — commands this: Leviticus 19:18 — "You shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord." And then stretches that love beyond the borders of the in-group: Leviticus 19:33-34 — "You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt."

Love the stranger as yourself, because you remember what it felt like to be one. That command is not a footnote to Leviticus. According to Jesus, it is the summit of the whole law. Matthew 22:37-40 — "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart... You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets." When Jesus reached for the greatest commandments, he pulled the second one straight out of Leviticus 19.

And Leviticus 19 gets specific in ways that should make every reader squirm: leave part of your harvest for the poor; pay your workers on time; no slander; no grudges; honest scales. The chapter reads less like ancient history and more like a printout of our actual sins. God's holiness code spends far more ink on money, speech, and fairness than most of its quoters ever do.

So here is the test of whether we actually believe Leviticus, and it cuts hardest against the church's loudest voices. Picture a gay man walking into your church this Sunday, or a teenager wrestling with their gender arriving at youth group. Leviticus — the very book people quote at them — commands that they be treated like the native-born: not done wrong, not held at arm's length, loved as ourselves. Anyone who can recite 18:22 from memory but has never obeyed 19:34 toward an actual person is not a defender of Leviticus. He is picking and choosing — just with different verses than the meme accuses him of.

What the law cannot do

There is one more honest thing to say about Leviticus, and it is where the law itself points. Peter quotes it to Christians: 1 Peter 1:15-16 — "but as he who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, since it is written, 'You shall be holy, for I am holy.'" Read that and then sit quietly for a minute. Who has done this? Loved every neighbor as themselves? Kept every desire in order? The law is a perfect standard issued to people who cannot meet it — and that is not a design flaw. Martin Luther saw what the gap is for:

"The law says, 'Do this,' and it is never done. Grace says, 'Believe in this,' and everything is already done." — Martin Luther, Heidelberg Disputation

Grace is God's undeserved kindness. Picture a report card where the only passing grade is perfection. The law is that report card — accurate, unbending, and unable to tutor you to a pass. Grace is not the teacher curving the grade. Grace is the one student in history who scored perfectly, handing you his transcript with your name written on it. Augustine, a thousand years before Luther, traced the same circle:

"The law was given, in order that grace might be sought; grace was given, in order that the law might be fulfilled." — Augustine, On the Spirit and the Letter

The law drives us to Christ; Christ then begins, slowly, to write the law's love into us. Be careful, though, not to twist grace into a shrug. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who died resisting Hitler, called that counterfeit by name:

"Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate." — Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship

Real grace does not lower the standard; it pays for our failure to meet it and then starts changing us. And the payment was not a metaphor. John Stott compressed the whole gospel into one sentence:

"The essence of sin is man substituting himself for God, while the essence of salvation is God substituting himself for man." — John Stott, The Cross of Christ

At the cross, the Holy One of Leviticus took the place of law-breakers — every kind of law-breaker, from every chapter of the book. That is why a Christian can read Leviticus 18 without panic and Leviticus 19 without pride. The law shows us God's character. The cross shows us our standing. We needed both pages all along.

Going Deeper

Tonight, read Leviticus 19 — the whole chapter; it takes about five minutes. Bring a pen. Do not mark the verses that apply to other people. Mark the ones that apply to you: honesty in business, care for the poor, no gossip, no grudges, love for the stranger. Pick the single command you have been ignoring most comfortably, and do one concrete thing about it before tomorrow.

Key Quotes

I find it frustrating when I read or hear columnists, pundits, or journalists dismiss Christians as inconsistent because 'they pick and choose which of the rules in the Bible to obey.'

tim keller, 'Old Testament Law and the Charge of Inconsistency' (Redeemer Report, 2012)

Holy is the way God is. To be holy he does not conform to a standard. He is that standard.

A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy

Their delight in the Law is a delight in having touched firmness; like the pedestrian's delight in feeling the hard road beneath his feet after a false short cut has long entangled him in muddy fields.

The law says, 'Do this,' and it is never done. Grace says, 'Believe in this,' and everything is already done.

Martin Luther, Heidelberg Disputation

The law was given, in order that grace might be sought; grace was given, in order that the law might be fulfilled.

Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.

The essence of sin is man substituting himself for God, while the essence of salvation is God substituting himself for man.

John Stott, The Cross of Christ

Prayer Focus

Ask God for two things that rarely travel together: honesty and gentleness. Honesty to read hard texts like Leviticus 18 without explaining them away, and gentleness to read them the way Jesus did — alongside the command to love your neighbor as yourself. Then ask him to show you which command in Leviticus 19 you are currently ignoring.

Meditation

Leviticus 19:34 commands Israel to love the stranger 'as yourself,' because 'you were strangers in the land of Egypt.' God ties love for outsiders to the memory of being an outsider. When have you been the stranger in the room — and how should that memory change how you treat whoever feels like the stranger in your church?

Question for Discussion

The 'shellfish argument' says Christians pick and choose from Leviticus. The traditional reply distinguishes ceremonial laws (fulfilled in Christ) from moral laws (reaffirmed by the New Testament). Test yourself honestly: do you apply that method consistently, or does your reading of Scripture conveniently get strict about other people's temptations and flexible about your own?

Day 3Day 4 of 10Day 5