Day 1 of 7
Two Kingdoms, Two Cities
Augustine's framework for faith and politics
Scripture Readings
Today's Reading
Read John 18:33-37: Pilate asks Jesus, "Are you the King of the Jews?" Jesus responds: "My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world."
Then read Hebrews 13:14: "For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come."
Reflection
Before we can think clearly about Christian faith and national identity, we need a framework. Augustine provided the most enduring one in Christian history.
In City of God — written as the Roman Empire was collapsing — Augustine described two cities that coexist throughout history. "Two cities have been formed by two loves: the earthly by the love of self, even to the contempt of God; the heavenly by the love of God, even to the contempt of self." The City of Man — every earthly political order — is organized around human power, human glory, and human ambition. The City of God — the church in its eternal reality — is organized around the love of God and the hope of eternity.
The genius of Augustine's framework is that the two cities are intermingled. They cannot be neatly separated in this age. Christians live in both cities simultaneously. They pay taxes, serve in government, build institutions, and care for their neighbors — all while knowing that their deepest allegiance belongs to a kingdom that no election can establish and no revolution can overthrow.
Jesus made this clear in his exchange with Pilate. "My kingdom is not of this world." This is not a statement of political disengagement — Jesus was not saying his kingdom is irrelevant to the world. He was saying his kingdom operates by different principles. The kingdoms of this world are maintained by force. Christ's kingdom is established by sacrifice. The kingdoms of this world demand loyalty through coercion. Christ's kingdom invites allegiance through love.
Hebrews 13:14 reinforces the point: "Here we have no lasting city." Christians are residents but not ultimate citizens of any earthly nation. This should inoculate us against both Christian nationalism — the belief that our nation is or should be the City of God — and Christian withdrawal — the belief that the City of God has nothing to say to the City of Man.
C.S. Lewis observed a paradox that Augustine would have appreciated: "If you read history you will find that the Christians who did most for the present world were just those who thought most of the next." The Christians who are most useful to their country are precisely those who refuse to worship it. The ones who can serve the common good most freely are those whose ultimate hope is elsewhere.
Going Deeper
Augustine wrote City of God as Rome fell — and his point was that Rome's fall was not the end of the world, because Rome was never the City of God in the first place. What would it mean for you to hold your national identity with that same looseness? Not with contempt — Augustine loved Rome even as he critiqued it — but with the freedom that comes from knowing that your true citizenship is in a city that cannot be shaken?
Key Quotes
“Two cities have been formed by two loves: the earthly by the love of self, even to the contempt of God; the heavenly by the love of God, even to the contempt of self.”
“If you read history you will find that the Christians who did most for the present world were just those who thought most of the next.”
Prayer Focus
Ask God to help you see your earthly citizenship with clear eyes — grateful for its blessings, honest about its limits, and grounded in the unshakable citizenship of heaven.
Meditation
Jesus told Pilate, 'My kingdom is not of this world.' What does it mean that Christ's kingdom operates by different rules than earthly kingdoms — and how should this change the way you engage in politics?
Question for Discussion
Augustine said the City of God and the City of Man are intermingled in this age — you cannot fully separate them until the end. How does this challenge both the desire to create a 'Christian nation' and the desire to keep faith entirely private?